Rogue Access Point

A rogue access point is a wireless access point installed on a network's infrastructure without the consent of the network's owner.

A rogue access point is a wireless access point installed on a network’s infrastructure without the consent of the network’s owner. Rogue access points are used for various attacks, including denial of service, data theft, and other malware deployments. Rogue access points can create serious security holes in an enterprise network, leaving it vulnerable to attacks from outside. 

2023 Global Mobile Threat Report

A mobile device could also act as such if configured to broadcast a wireless signal and grant access to the network. In addition, mobile devices such as smartphones or tablets can be set up to act as Wi-Fi hotspots or tethering devices, enabling other devices to connect to the internet through them. Unfortunately, if an unauthorized user sets up a rogue access point on their mobile device and connects it to a network without proper authorization, they could gain access to sensitive information or compromise security.

Active Interception Vs. Passive Interception by a Rogue Access Point

Active and passive interceptions in the context of a network rogue access point refer to two distinct methods for intercepting network traffic. Rogue access points are unauthorized wireless access points set up by malicious actors to eavesdrop on or manipulate network communications. Here’s a technical explanation of the difference between active and passive interceptions:

Active Interception: Active interception involves the rogue access point actively engaging with network traffic, typically by pretending to be a legitimate access point or exploiting the trust of connected devices. Here’s how it works:

  • Deceptive Access Point: In an active interception scenario, the rogue access point broadcasts its presence with a network name (SSID) and security parameters mimicking a legitimate access point. This deception lures nearby devices to connect to it, believing it to be a genuine network.
  • Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attacks: Once devices connect to the rogue access point, the attacker can act as a man-in-the-middle. “Man-in-the-middle” means that all data traffic between the connected devices and the internet passes through the rogue access point. The attacker can intercept, inspect, modify, or record the data passing through, potentially capturing sensitive information like login credentials or confidential data.
  • Injecting Malicious Content: Active interceptions allow the attacker to inject malicious content into the data flow. For example, they can manipulate web pages, inject malware into downloads, or tamper with software updates.
  • Disruption: Active interception can also lead to network disruptions and instability, creating conflicts with legitimate access points and leading to performance issues for connected devices.

Passive Interception: Passive interception, on the other hand, does not actively interfere with network traffic but rather silently eavesdrops on it. Here’s how passive interception works:

  • Silent Observation: The rogue access point does not broadcast its presence or overtly interact with network traffic. It simply listens to and records the traffic within its range without actively participating in the network.
  • Packet Sniffing: Passive interception typically involves packet sniffing, where the rogue access point captures network packets as they traverse the airwaves. Packet sniffing can be done with tools like Wireshark or specialized hardware.
  • Data Collection: While not altering the data, passive interception collects packets, allowing the attacker to analyze them later for valuable information such as login credentials, unencrypted data, or network traffic patterns.
  • Reduced Visibility: Passive interception is often harder to detect than active interception since the rogue access point doesn’t actively engage with connected devices or disrupt the network.

In summary, the critical difference between active and passive interceptions in a network rogue access point is that active interceptions involve the rogue access point actively engaging with and potentially manipulating network traffic, while passive interceptions simply observe and record network traffic without active participation. Both methods pose security risks and should be mitigated through proper network monitoring, security policies, and encryption and authentication mechanisms.

Evil Twin Attacks Vs. Rogue Access Point Attacks

An “evil twin” attack and a “rogue access point” attack are techniques malicious actors use to compromise network security, but they involve different approaches and have distinct technical differences. Here’s an explanation of these differences:

Evil Twin Attacks: An evil twin attack is a type of wireless network attack where an attacker sets up a fraudulent wireless access point (AP) that closely mimics a legitimate one. The attacker’s fraudulent AP has the same SSID (network name) and often similar security settings to deceive users and devices into connecting.

Key Characteristics

  • Deception: In an evil twin attack, the attacker aims to deceive users and devices into connecting to their rogue AP, thinking it is the legitimate network they intend to access.
  • SSID Cloning: The attacker clones the SSID of the target network to make the evil twin AP appear as though it’s part of the same network.
  • Man-in-the-Middle (MitM): Once devices connect to the evil twin AP, the attacker can perform man-in-the-middle attacks to intercept, monitor, and potentially manipulate the data traffic between the devices and the internet.
  • Data Collection and Eavesdropping: The attacker can eavesdrop on the traffic and potentially capture sensitive information, such as login credentials, without the users’ knowledge.

Rogue Access Point Attacks: A rogue access point attack involves deploying an unauthorized wireless access point within an organization’s network or vicinity. This access point is not necessarily attempting to impersonate a legitimate network as in an evil twin attack but is used to provide unauthorized wireless connectivity.

Key Characteristics

  • Unauthenticated Access: The rogue access point usually openly broadcasts its presence and does not attempt to mimic an existing network.
  • Unauthorized Access: It may be set up without permission within an organization, making it unauthorized, and can be operated by an insider or an outsider.
  • Uncontrolled Connectivity: Devices connecting to the rogue access point may be unaware of the security risks, and their data may be exposed to potential attacks, as the access point may lack the same security measures as the legitimate network.
  • Network Disruption: Rogue access points can interfere with the operation of legitimate wireless networks and disrupt network performance.

Key Technical Differences

  • Deception vs. Unauthorized: The primary difference is in the intent and approach. Evil twin attacks rely on deception by mimicking legitimate networks, while rogue access point attacks are unauthorized and do not necessarily deceive users through SSID cloning.
  • Man-in-the-Middle: Evil twin attacks often involve man-in-the-middle tactics to intercept and manipulate data, while rogue access points can disrupt network operations without necessarily intercepting data in a targeted way.
  • Visibility: Evil twin attacks are more covert because they aim to impersonate a legitimate network, while rogue access points are typically more visible as unauthorized devices in the network.

Both attacks can have severe security implications, and organizations need to implement security measures such as network monitoring, strong authentication, encryption, and intrusion detection systems to mitigate these threats. Additionally, user awareness and education are essential to recognize and avoid connecting to potentially malicious wireless networks.

Methods for Securing A Network from a Rogue Access Point

Here are standard techniques to secure your network from a rogue access point:

  • Network Segmentation: By splitting up your network into different segments or VLANs (Virtual Local Area Networks), isolating sensitive data and restricting access for unauthorized users becomes possible.
  • Strong Network Authentication: Utilize strong and unique passwords on all network devices, such as routers, switches, and access points, to ensure maximum protection from attackers. Avoid default or weak passwords that could pose an easy target for breaches.
  • Encryption: For maximum protection on your Wi-Fi network, enable WPA2 or WPA3 encryption to encrypt data transmitted between devices and access points; this makes it harder for attackers to intercept and comprehend it.
  • WIDS): Utilizing a Wireless Intrusion Detection System can assist your network administrators in monitoring unapproved access points on the network and alerting administrators of any devices attempting to gain entry. WIDS systems provide valuable alerts if any unauthorized devices try to connect and gain entry.
  • Routine Scanning: Regular scanning should be conducted to detect unauthorized access points. Tools exist that can help identify any unauthorized devices and their locations.
  • Physical Security: Provide physical access control over network devices and access points to prevent unapproved equipment installations. Ensure all network equipment is stored safely within locked and monitored facilities to prevent unapproved installations of new software programs or hardware updates.
  • Implement 802.1X Authentication: Implement 802.1X authentication, which requires users to provide credentials before being given network access to prevent unauthorized devices from joining your network.
  • Filtering MAC Addresses: Although bypassable, MAC address filtering provides an extra layer of network security by only permitting devices with pre-approved MAC addresses to connect.
  • Maintain Regular Firmware Updates: Staying current on firmware updates of your network devices can ensure that any known vulnerabilities are patched quickly.
  • Employee Training and Awareness: Raise employee awareness of the dangers associated with connecting unauthorized devices to the network and the importance of reporting any suspicious activity as soon as it arises.
  • Continuous Monitoring: Utilize network monitoring to detect abnormal behavior or devices connected without authorization.
  • Disable Plug-and-Play: Disabling the plug-and-play feature on network devices will prevent unauthorized devices from connecting without prior configuration and authorization.

Remember that network security is an ongoing effort that requires technical measures and user awareness to prevent any rogue access points or other security threats from emerging.

Related Content

Receive Zimperium proprietary research notes and vulnerability bulletins in your inbox

Get started with Zimperium today