Local File Inclusion (LFI)

Local file inclusion is a vulnerability that allows attackers to read, include, or execute files on the application server.

Local file inclusion is a vulnerability that allows attackers to read, include, or execute files on the application server. This could include system files, application source code, configuration files, and other sensitive data. The LFI vulnerability occurs when an application allows input (usually from the user or another application component) to influence file paths in file operations. Local File Inclusion vulnerabilities are typically found in web applications. Still, its principles can also apply to specific scenarios in mobile application development, especially for Android and iOS apps that heavily interact with web services or incorporate webview components.

How Local File Inclusion Vulnerabilities Impact Mobile Applications

  • Webview Components: Mobile applications often use webview to display web content. If the webview is improperly configured and allows the loading of local files based on external inputs, it can lead to LFI. A webview component is particularly risky in Android apps where the file system has a more open structure.
  • Interactions with Web Services: Mobile apps frequently interact with backend web services. If these services are vulnerable to LFI, the mobile app indirectly becomes a vector for exploiting this vulnerability. For example, an app might allow users to specify a file path for downloading data, which could be manipulated to access unauthorized files.
  • Improper File Handling: Some apps, especially those that deal with file management or editing, might allow users to open or save files. If the paths for these files are not correctly sanitized or restricted, attackers could exploit this to access sensitive files on the device.
  • Cross-Platform Frameworks: Apps developed using cross-platform frameworks might be more susceptible if the framework has LFI vulnerabilities that haven’t been addressed across all platforms.

Best Practices for Securing Mobile Apps that Contain Local File Inclusions

Securing a mobile app that uses Local File Inclusion (LFI) requires a multifaceted approach. This approach involves not only addressing the LFI vulnerability itself but also implementing broader security best practices. Here’s a detailed breakdown for Android and iOS app developers:

Validate and Sanitize Inputs

  • Strict Input Validation: Implement rigorous validation for any input affecting file operations. This validation should include checking file names, paths, and any other parameters that could be manipulated.
  • Sanitize Inputs: Remove or encode potentially dangerous characters in inputs. Ensure inputs conform to expected patterns or values.

Use Whitelisting for File Access

  • Implement Whitelists: Define a list of allowed files and restrict file operations to this list. Ensure that any file access outside this list is blocked.
  • Directory Traversal Protection: Prevent directory traversal attacks by ensuring file paths cannot navigate to parent directories (e.g., disallowing ‘..’ sequences).

Apply the Principle of Least Privilege

  • Limit File System Access: Ensure the app only has permission to access files necessary for its functionality.
  • User and Process Isolation: Run processes with the minimum necessary privileges. Isolate user data from other users and processes.

Secure File Storage and Transmission

  • Encrypt Sensitive Data: Use strong encryption for storing sensitive data locally.
  • Secure Data Transmission: Use HTTPS and other secure protocols to transmit data, preventing man-in-the-middle attacks.

Configure Webview Securely (for Android)

  • Disable Unnecessary Features: If using Webview, turn off features like setAllowFileAccessFromFileURLs and setAllowFileAccess unless necessary.
  • Use Content Providers with Caution: Be cautious with Content Providers as they can expose file URIs and paths to other apps.

Secure Backend Interactions

  • Validate Server Responses: When interacting with backend services, validate the responses to ensure they don’t contain executable code or paths to sensitive files.
  • API Security: Secure your APIs with authentication and authorization checks, ensuring they don’t unquestioningly trust input from the client side.

Implement Robust Error Handling

  • Suppress Detailed Errors: Do not reveal sensitive information in error messages. Log detailed errors internally for debugging but show generic messages to users.
  • Fail Securely: Design the app to fail securely in case of an error without exposing vulnerabilities.

Conduct Regular Security Audits and Testing

  • Static and Dynamic Analysis: Use tools for static code analysis and dynamic analysis to identify potential security flaws.
  • Penetration Testing: Conduct regular penetration tests to simulate attacks and identify vulnerabilities.

Keep Software Updated

  • Update Libraries and Frameworks: Regularly update all libraries, frameworks, and tools used in the development process to patch known vulnerabilities.

User Education and Awareness

  • Inform Users: Educate users about secure practices, especially regarding how they handle data within the app.

Securing a mobile app, especially in the context of potential LFI vulnerabilities, requires a comprehensive approach that covers input validation, access control, secure configurations, and regular security assessments. By following these best practices, developers can significantly reduce the risk of LFI and other security vulnerabilities in their mobile applications.

Securing Local File Inclusions in Android vs. iOS Mobile Apps

Securing mobile applications against Local File Inclusion (LFI) vulnerabilities involves platform-specific considerations, especially when comparing Android and iOS. Each platform has its unique architecture, security features, and development practices. Here’s a breakdown of the critical differences in securing apps against LFI on these platforms:


  • File System Structure: Android uses a more open file system, which can be more susceptible to LFI if not correctly secured. Apps can have private storage, but shared storage areas are common, increasing the risk of unauthorized file access.
  • Permissions: Android apps must explicitly request permissions for accessing different parts of the file system. Developers must carefully manage these permissions to limit access only to necessary files and directories.
  • Intent and Content Providers: Android’s Intent system and Content Providers can expose file paths and URIs to other applications, which can be a vector for LFI if not correctly handled. Securing content providers and validating intents are crucial to preventing LFI vulnerabilities.
  • Webview Security: Android apps often use Webview, which can be a risk factor for LFI if it allows loading local files based on user input or external sources. Securely configuring Webview settings, like disabling setAllowFileAccessFromFileURLs, is essential.
  • Storage Access Framework (SAF): SAF provides a standardized way to access files, offering an additional abstraction layer and security. It allows users to select which files to give the app access to, reducing the risk of unauthorized file access.


  • Sandbox Environment: iOS employs a strict sandboxing approach, where each app operates in its isolated environment. This limits the app’s ability to access files outside its sandbox, inherently reducing the risk of LFI.
  • File System Access: Direct file system access is more restricted in iOS than in Android. Apps typically only have access to their sandbox directory and must use specific APIs to access other files, like photos or contacts.
  • URL Schemes: iOS uses URL schemes for inter-app communication, which can potentially expose file paths. Developers must validate any URL inputs and limit the exposure of file paths through these schemes.
  • WKWebView: iOS apps use WKWebView to display web content. Like Android’s Webview, it requires careful configuration to prevent LFI. The default configuration of WKWebView is more restrictive, reducing the risk of LFI compared to Webview in Android.
  • App Store Review Process: iOS apps undergo a stringent review process before being published on the App Store. This process can help identify some security issues, including potential LFI vulnerabilities, although it’s not foolproof.

Common Best Practices

Despite these platform-specific differences, some common best practices apply to both Android and iOS:

  • Input Validation and Sanitization: Rigorously validate and sanitize all inputs that could influence file paths.
  • Least Privilege Principle: Limit the app’s permissions to access only what is necessary.
  • Regular Security Audits and Updates: Continually audit the app for vulnerabilities and keep all components updated.

In conclusion, while the core principles of securing an app against LFI are similar across platforms, the implementation details differ due to the distinct architectures and security models of Android and iOS. Understanding these nuances is crucial for developers to safeguard their mobile applications effectively.

Related Content

Receive Zimperium proprietary research notes and vulnerability bulletins in your inbox

Get started with Zimperium today